|
Address by the President of
Colombia, Álvaro Uribe, at the
opening of the First Round of
Negotiations between the Andean
Community and the European Union
Bogotá, September 17, 2007
“I would like to thank all of you
for accompanying us at the
formal launching of these
negotiations. Truth to
tell, it took us quite some time
to reach this point. This
process calls for political
will, perseverance and patience.
We have all the political will
in the world, we have persevered
and we have exercised a great
deal of patience to reach this
point, but, starting today, we
will have to be impatient in
order to achieve this agreement
in the shortest time possible.
Please allow me to say a few words
as President pro tempore of the
Andean Community and President
of Colombia, who welcomes you
today with all affection.
Five years ago, we in the Andean
Community considered that an
agreement with Mercosur was
impossible. The attitudes
were both indifference and
resistance. This agreement
was already in effect in many
places, and in others there was
no interest in it.
We set ourselves to get the
agreement off the ground and did
so. And now the deadlines
are rapidly approaching;
although some asymmetries were
negotiated, the deadlines are
being met.
I believe it offered a great
opportunity to move ahead with
the integration of our South
American continent. Four
years ago, we started to build
the South American union; it is
gaining ground and we trust that
day-by-day we are moving toward
its materialization.
The Andean Community can once
again count on Chile as a
member. This is an
extraordinary step. Chile
was one of its founders and
circumstances led to its
withdrawal in a search for a
more rapid means of reaching
international trade agreements.
Chile’s return must help give us a
clearer vision and to be more
dynamic in taking a place in
growing world trade.
I trust that we will shortly be
able to announce the formal
return of our sister Bolivarian
Republic of Venezuela to the
Andean Community.
Please allow me to send this
message: All of us here know in
our deepest hearts that Ecuador,
Peru, Bolivia and Colombia are
here today on behalf of the
Andean Community, but that we
have a space reserved here for
Venezuela and feel assured that
with Venezuela’s presence and
full return to the Andean
Community, we will be able to
carry these negotiations to a
successful conclusion.
Our Foreign Ministers and the
Secretary General of the Andean
Community, Freddy Ehlers, who
have brought enormous enthusiasm
to the undertaking so that we
can move ahead with the process,
are with us today. Now it
is our Ministers of Economy and
Trade who must work to bring
other States into the Andean
Community as associate members
like Chile.
Colombia and Peru have both signed
agreements with Chile. Now
Colombia and Peru are proposing
a bilateral agreement to deepen
the decisions, treaties and
legislation that link us up
multilaterally within the Andean
Community in order remove all
barriers to investment.
Five years ago, Colombia applied
for membership in the Puebla-Panama
Plan and was accepted. We took
that step to fulfill the
obligation stemming from our
geographic location as the
bridge between Central America,
the vision of Mesoamerica and
our South America. We
trust that membership in the
Puebla-Panama Plan will be
opened to all countries to the
south and that our Andean sister
nations will begin to consider
the possibility of joining the
Puebla-Panama Plan.
Just a few days ago, Colombia and
Peru started to negotiate with
Canada --an important exponent
of universal democracy-- and are
pleased to see how enthusiastic
all of our Andean sister nations
are about those negotiations.
We trust that we will be able to
move ahead with agreements with
China and with India for
reciprocal protection of our
investments and are seeking to
join up with all of the world’s
economies.
We participate strongly in the
Pacific, where some of our
sister nations belong to the
Asia-Pacific Economic
Cooperation Forum (APEC) and
others don’t. We are
concerned that the moratorium on
new membership has not been
lifted and that, in fact, its
consideration has been put off
again, this time to 2010 because
we all have a legitimate
interest, as Pacific Basin
countries, in becoming members
of that organization.
We are now, after having strived
for a long time, beginning this
process with the European Union.
The unilateral preferences are
incomplete and their time frame
still uncertain. They are
barely a few cautious privileges
for the entry of products into a
market, but lack a plan for
cooperation and political
dialogue. Furthermore, the
uncertain nature of these
preferences keeps investment
from materializing.
Those who are planning to invest
first consider whether access to
the markets is guaranteed for
the long term is or merely a
temporary privilege.
Investors will have no confidence
in the Andean Community if the
privilege it is given to place
products in the European Union
is only a temporary one.
But they will have confidence in
our countries if they are
notified that an
agreement,
which we are now beginning to
negotiate, guarantees access to
the European Union.
I consider extremely important the
fact that this agreement is not
merely a trade agreement, but
also one on cooperation, on
political dialogue.
Cooperation and political dialogue
on issues as significant as
those referred to by the Deputy
Director General of Foreign
Affairs of the European Union,
Mr. Joao Aguiar Machado.
Political dialogue and cooperation
in order to advance in the fight
against global warming, to
overcome poverty definitively,
to win the war on drugs.
We look with optimism upon this
agreement, which is not typical
because of the elements it
includes. I would
respectfully recommend to the
Andean Community’s negotiating
team that it speed up the
negotiations insofar as
possible. Every day that
passes without moving ahead with
concrete measures to overcome
poverty is one more day of
suffering for our nations.
I can see that there is confidence
among all of the Andean
countries and the European
Union. We should take
advantage of that confidence to
hasten these negotiations.
In am concerned that a 24-month
deadline be set, as of today,
for the conclusion of the
negotiations. This is not
the first agreement to be
negotiated by the European
Union, nor is the first that we
are negotiating. We should
be capable of shortening the
timeframe.
Lastly, we all have an idea of
where we want to arrive.
If we are all capable of having
a fairly good idea of where we
have to arrive, then why delay
the arrival at that point; why
not shorten the deadlines?
For us, these trade agreements are
not ideological categories, nor
are they born from political
values. They are
opportunities for our nations;
they are opportunities to
overcome poverty, to build
equity, to give our nations
easier access to frontier
technology, easier access to
markets with a high capacity for
consumption.
These agreements are opportunities
to create high quality
employment, with social security
affiliation. They are
opportunities for
entrepreneurship to flourish.
A trade agreement accompanied by
political dialogue is a
guarantee that the benefits must
be tied in directly with
overcoming poverty and achieving
equity.
A student was asking me: ‘What do
you mean by trade agreement with
the European Union plus
political dialogue?’ I told him:
‘We understand that the
political dialogue will include
the overcoming of poverty and
that, therefore, we are going to
move toward that goal on two
related fronts: those of
dialogue and of economic
reality.”
Although there are differences
among the economies and it is
more urgent for some of them
than for others to reach those
agreements, in the end everyone
benefits. Furthermore, if
the European Union has
demonstrated anything, it is
that it has been incorporating
many of the world’s countries
with institutions and in
equitable conditions. That
must give us more confidence.
There are some who still think
that the imperative of
stimulating the domestic economy
by giving the large masses of
people who have been excluded a
role to play in it and trade
agreements are mutually
exclusive.
That is not the case; rather, they
complement each other.
Trade agreements boost
investment, offer markets,
create more opportunities,
which, if well directed, can
insert the large excluded masses
in our countries into the
vigorously growing economy and
put them on the proper courses
to overcome poverty and build
equity.
How good it would be if this were
to occur not within two years,
but before that. That we
could all sit down and say:
‘These negotiations have been
concluded satisfactorily.’
And to give our nations that
reason for optimism, for
tranquility.
Last week, 1,500 Colombians
accepted a commitment: to build
a national consensus on a
productive society, as one of
the courses for reaching an
equitable society.
These courses help make those
purposes a reality. These
trade agreements create
opportunities, but also pose
challenges: the challenge
to concern ourselves with and to
strive more strongly for
productivity, for
competitiveness; for turning
social discourse into reality;
for applying environmental
protection policies that go
beyond mere talk. In
short, everything is advisable.
On behalf of my Andean colleagues,
I would like to thank the
European Union heartedly for
having permitted us to launch
these negotiations today.
And I wish the negotiators the
best of luck.
I would like to note that when we
were studying the candidacy of
Freddy Ehlers for Secretary
General of the Andean Community
in Rio de Janeiro, I said to
him: ‘Dear Freddy, we are
very enthusiastic about your
candidacy. Help us rapidly
start these negotiations with
the European Union.’
And Freddy has done so. But
now we have another job for him.
I’ve run out of excuses on this
issue and you’re in an even
greater predicament.
Neither you nor I have the time
any longer to wait 24 months.
Let us carry out these
negotiations rapidly because our
countries need that agreement
urgently.
Thank-you very much”. |