I
should first of all like to place
on record our gratitude to the
Government and people of Qatar for
the organization of this
Conference and, above all, the
warm hospitality with which we
have been received.
I
would also like to highlight the
efforts made by the Chairman of
the General Council, Mr Stuart Harbinson,
and the Director-General, Mr Mike
Moore, and to congratulate them on
their work.
The
Fourth Ministerial Conference of
the World Trade Organization comes
at a very difficult juncture in
world affairs, at the beginning of
a marked economic recession
compounded by the regrettable
events of 11 September, the full
consequences of which we are as
yet unable to gauge, either in
economic, political or social
terms.
Against that backdrop, the
challenge before us is enormous,
for not only must we preserve the
system, the credibility of which
was brought into question and
diminished by the failure of
Seattle, but we must also renew it
so as to make it a factor that
contributes to harmonious and
increasingly convergent
development of the world as a
whole.
Aware of these pressing needs in
the world order, Bolivia has come
to Doha to support the start of
the new phase in the WTO that
should follow from the application
of the programme of negotiations
on which we will agree.
In
this perspective, it is becoming
clear to us that all countries
agree that if we are not to repeat
the mistakes of the last,
unsuccessful negotiations,
development must be placed at the
very core of the multilateral
trading system. We fully share and
support this view.
We
cannot help wondering, however,
just how genuine is that level of
agreement, for as soon as we turn
to more specific issues and the
consideration of concrete
proposals to enhance the
development of those countries
most in need of it, many of these
statements turn out to be
inconsistent.
Bolivia is amongst those countries
that consider it indispensable to
take steps that do not further
polarize development amongst the
countries of the world. Failing
this, tensions will be aggravated
leading to uncontrollable
reactions that will affect all
countries in the long run.
In
this connection, my country
considers it a priority for all
sectors involved in international
trade to be treated in a balanced
manner. We therefore cannot accept
further delay in bringing
agriculture under the rules and
disciplines of the Organization.
We
have stated and we repeat it. For
us too, this sector involves other
concerns and implications distinct
from the merely trade-related
aspect. These pertain to reduction
of poverty, eliminating the
conditions of extreme poverty in
which Bolivians live in rural
areas. The development prospects
of this sector and its integration
into international markets will
also dictate whether we will be
able to maintain the progress we
have made at great sacrifice by
eliminating coca leaf plantations.
In this way we have made an
appreciable contribution to
humanity as a whole, as it has
meant the removal from circulation
of more than 220 tonnes of cocaine,
which until recently were
undoubtedly being distributed in
the major capitals of the world.
For
Bolivia, full compliance with the
commitments assumed within the WTO
framework is exacting a very high
economic, social and political
price. Nevertheless, this has not
been matched by my country's
participation in international
markets, where it is facing
considerable difficulties arising
in large measure from non-compliance
or "sui generis"
interpretations in the application
of Agreements. For this reason and
because we believe that the only
way to secure the credibility of
the system is by complying with
what has been agreed, we consider
it of the highest importance for
adequate treatment to be given to
this sensitive topic at this
Conference.
Moreover, Bolivia is one of the
countries most convinced of the
need to conserve and protect the
environment. It was therefore one
of the first developing countries
to have an Agenda 21, with clear
and unambiguous national rules,
even to the detriment of
exportation, which it so badly
needs. Nevertheless, we are
opposed to any attempt to utilize
this issue for the purposes of
market protection. We do not think
it would be a wise decision to
include it in the WTO agenda.
There are other more appropriate
and effective forums for this if
the objective is really to take
care of our planet.
I
wish to underscore the importance
of the declaration that we will
approve in due course linking
intellectual property and public
health, as it will represent a
meaningful legal instrument and a
political message, giving a human
face to the World Trade
Organization. It is our hope that
the terms on which we agree will
be forceful in giving priority to
health and human life over the
interests of invention.
I
cannot conclude without stating my
country's special satisfaction at
the accession of the People's
Republic of China the World Trade
Organization, as it marks an
historic milestone for that
country and for our Organization.
This means that only now can it
really purport to be of global
reach, with the inclusion of over
1,200 million inhabitants
representing one-fifth of the
world's population.
We
must henceforth ensure that the
WTO will also have a balanced
global impact that benefits all
countries equitably. This makes it
necessary to distinguish between
the various levels of developing
countries and accord appropriate
treatment to countries with small
and more vulnerable economies.
It
is our hope that the outcome of
this Fourth Ministerial Conference
will make it possible for the
actions of a renewed and
invigorated WTO to contribute to
building a world that is fair,
prosperous, united and based on
solidarity, these being objectives
of which we must be mindful, now
more than ever.